-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 742
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ICU-22325 BRS74RC: Update version number to 74.1 #2613
Conversation
I just merged a PR that simplifies the versioning on the Java side (#2624) It is easy to update all the pom versions:
But there are still places to update in 2 files:
|
Thanks Mihai! |
@mihnita @markusicu I added commits to update the relevant release process docs based on what I saw from Mihai's comments. Please review that I got it correct. Also, the version numbers have already been set correctly by Mihai's PR. I merged the latest from |
I can't rebase / merge, it is grayed out.
? |
For reference:
72:
Inconsistent, but my memory is that we have tried to move some of these changes forward to reduce work. |
`mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=75.0.1-SNAPSHOT` is executed. | ||
|
||
4. Update the `api.doc.version` property. | ||
Edit the root pom file at `icu4j/pom.xml` and manually make this change: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBD: we might consider using the version directly instead of ${icu.major.version}
.
That way one can change it from command line:
mvn versions:set-property -DnewVersion="75 Release Candidate" -Dproperty=api.doc.version
Or maybe remove "Release Candidate" completely.
"In my book" RC means: if there are no problems found then this is promoted to GA.
Using "Release Candidate" anywhere means that even if everything is perfect, one has to remove such and rebuild in order to release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: not actionable for this PR, of course.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm tnx!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tnx!
a62dfd9
to
0b43675
Compare
Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃 ~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot |
Checklist